The Home of Maltese Għana

 

Front Page | Intro Page | What is Maltese Għana? | History of Għana | Għana in Theatre | Photo Album
 Folksingers Listing | Guitarists Listing | Hall of Fame | Fatti u Poeżiji | Artikli bil-Malti | Articles in English | Scrapbook

The Wounding Song

 Honour, Politics and Rhetoric in Maltese Għana

 

Għana as ritual
 

Having traced the evolution of għana as being the course taken by a very broad genre of popular song as it came to be associated with a specific, highly formalised genre and a specific group of practitioners, it is pertinent to ask whether għana has become a ritual. Utilising insights gleaned from Van Gennep (1909), Victor Turner (1967), Leach (1976) and Bloch (1986), I shall try to demonstrate that għana is a ritual in the sense that:
 

  a. it is highly formalised and patterned;
 
  b. the singers are removed from society and are believed to be 'inspired';
 
  c. (i) it is a ritual of competition between singers as social personalities, and
(ii) a ritual of inversal for the għannejja as a 'class';
 
  d.

the audience participates in a very substantial way—it is not only an observer but also forms part of the 'content' of the songs.


Għana is certainly encapsulated from ordinary social life. Tensions between individuals that exist outside the għana context are not dragged into the performance. Whenever a fact having to do with ordinary social life is mentioned, it is done only to score 'points'. Thus, while the għannejja do not sing to resolve, say, disputes over land, an għannej might mention in song that his opponent has neglected to pay his electricity bill. Indeed, the għannejja are not bound together by anything other than għana (although a few happen to be related through marriage). If an għannej had to stop singing - as some do for their first few married years - he would cut himself off from the rest of the għannejja.

Għana is also marked off from the normal flow of life in that there are several unwritten rules or conventions governing the session itself that severely limit any spontaneity, barring, of course, the actual content of the songs. Clapping is frowned upon and quickly censured on the rare occasions on which it does occur,(11) and it is unthinkable that an aficionado would suggest a rhyme or reply to an għannej; occasionally this happens, the story goes, and then the session is likely to end in a brawl (though I was never told of a specific instance). The only spontaneity the audience is permitted is to laugh if a riposte is particularly witty. The exception here explains the rule: no explicit support should be shown towards any għannej while he is singing (although some aficionados are known to be the 'supporters' of a particular għannej); laughing is permitted because it downplays the tension of the event by stressing its ostensible joking character. That there is or can be a great amount of tension present is indubitable though. Once, a visiting għannej from Australia, Salvu 'l-Kalora', was singing opposite 'Superstar'. Although they are now on good terms it was well known that they had engaged in a particularly bitter and vicious quarrel a few years ago. When the session was drawing to a close and each għannej had sung his gadenza (the concluding eight-verse riposte), 'Kalora' burst into another gadenza. The spectators drew in a quick breath, thinking that he wanted to give 'Superstar' an extra blow, and only relaxed when 'Kalora', in the gadenza itself, excused himself with the audience and said he was only doing this to ask the oldest għannej who was present, Pawlu Seychell, if he (Pawlu) would do him the honour of singing with him.

Other conventions that govern the singing itself also serve to 'encapsulate' għana. In fact, there is a sense in which they could be seen as dividing the singing bout itself into pre-liminal, liminal and post-liminal stages. Thus, the first quatrains of the singers are usually taken up by telling who is singing, where and when; often the guitarists are also included. This convention was instigated with the advent of the tape-recorder, where the circulation of tape-recordings of several sessions necessitated the easy identification of a particular session. But this convention can be seen as easing in the start of the bout, especially when one considers that during these first quatrains the audience is sometimes reminded to keep quiet. Indeed, I have only seen the audience being addressed directly at the beginning or the end of the session, but not during the 'liminal' stage - the main fight itself.(12) Finally, this convention of 'easing into' a bout is strong enough that if a singer 'barges' into a fight with his first quatrain, he is seen as being particularly aggressive and possibly even a show-off.

Strong shades of a liminal state can be perceived in the main part of the bout itself. First, the themes themselves are dramatic and grave (even if dealt with wittily): they may be personal honour, reflections on social values, or political (in the narrow sense of the word). Second, the language used is not one that is used in ordinary social intercourse: it is high-flown, using elaborate metaphors and formalistic phrases, as well as (depending on the għannej) occasionally out rightly self-righteous. One of the most common metaphors is that comparing the two singers with race-horses while sprinkling quatrains with proverbs is prized for it adds a moralistic tone. Finally, some phrases are formulaic, the most common being "I am an għannej and so are you", and "I love(d) you and you love(d) me". Such formulaic phrases are common enough in oral poetry (Ong 1982: Finnegan 1981). Here the phrases may either be used ironically or else strategically, to manipulate the counterpart's response.

Their ironic deployment is obvious: such phrases usually precede an insult. It is the second use, the strategic manipulation of the opposite number's response, that is the more interesting, for it is reminiscent of Bloch's description of the use of formalised language for social control, especially to rule out disagreement (1975: 16). Here, Merina elders, for example (for similar techniques are also used by the Tikopian Maru, Tswana chiefs and New Guinea Highlanders among others), are deemed to use highly formalised language because of its lack of specificity as well as its being associated with tradition. I have observed a similar technique used by the għannejja, though the language used was not so restricted. A particular example is relevant here. In one situation one singer was trying to placate the other, who was nursing a grievance done to him by a third party. On this occasion the parties interested in burying the matter tended to use formulaic language as well as urging the grieved singer to 'forgive and forget' by using stock sayings as well as appeals to the singer's Christian charity. Thus, in successive quatrains, the first singer (Salvu 'l-Kalora') urged his companion (Pawlu Seychell) to follow Catholic Catechism ('Duttrina'), to forgive as all Christians do, and to remember that 'one should not act like the Mafia', harbouring grudges, but have a pure heart ready for the Day of Judgement. Under this sort of pressure, the aggrieved party must relent because otherwise the audience would deem him to be flouting traditionally held mores. He can only resist by saying that the grievance was far too big to be easy to forgive, as indeed another singer did in a second case. Yet this singer, too, relented after the session was over and drank with the għannej he held guilty of defaming him eleven years before.(13)

Thus the 'liminal' state consists of the two għannejja carrying on a debate in which the ritualised atmosphere permits both jokes at the other's expense and highly self-righteous language which in normal social intercourse would not go down very well. However, the sanctimonious language tends to fade away or be outrightly reversed during the gadenza. Thus, during a duel one singer chastised another for boasting that as a government employee he did not work for his money, calling him a social parasite in the process; however, in the gadenza the former slyly admitted that he wished he was granted the grace of being in the latter's position. Also, the insults hurled during the duel are normally disowned. It is usual in the gadenza for għannejja to refer to the insults exchanged as 'joking between friends'. Hence the gadenza, the marker of the transition back to normal discourse, may be regarded as a sort of post-liminal phase.

The ritualistic quality of għana is enhanced by other features. Firstly, as sung nowadays, a session has a pre-determined length - approximately one hour. Secondly, stating the names of the singers and the venue and date of the session gives the event a cosmic dimension. This is especially so when the date is given, for in Maltese the year must be uttered in word and not number form. Thus the singer states, say, (if the year were 1989): 'The year is nineteen hundred and eighty-nine, the month x, the day y' (instead of 'nineteen eighty-nine ...'). Paradoxically therefore, stating the date gives a timeless quality by putting the event on a par with other important historical dates. This tendency to connect disparate events together is further accentuated by the music, which although improvised follows a traditional tune. It is this linking which gives tragic Fattijiet (the non-extemporised għana which either relate a true or fictitious tale, generally tragic) a semi-mythological stature - for each story thus seems to be linked to all others that are played to the same tune thematically, as well as musically. In this respect għana can also serve to mythologise history. The best example of this is the Fatt called 'Mintoff Story', which is the biography of the charismatic former Labour Party leader and Prime Minister Dom Mintoff,(14) which is played to one of the most moving renditions of a traditional tragic tune - Mintoff's political vicissitudes thus gain epic proportions.

The mythological element is also present in a more substantial sense. As Sant Cassia points out, 'għana probably represents a language closer to "myth" than to poetry' (1989: 164). This is because of the effect of the riposte and counter-riposte, together with the value attached to sticking to the 'Subject', leads to the 'structure' of the duel becoming evident only through repeated oppositions.(15)

It is significant in this respect that the 'true' għannej is regarded as 'a genius, a poet'. His art is a 'gift from God, a vocation' - this was the very first thing my first interviewee Bamboċċu (and it was repeated to me many times by other people thereafter) told me, an 'outsider'. For għana is more than a form of competition between the għannejja: it also creates and expresses competition within this social group vis-a-vis the wider society. At its best għana is an epiphany of Divine Grace, as one listens and watches the għannej 'build his Subject', edifying the audience and, at least by implication, making statements about the central values of Maltese society as well as about Maltese identity. This is what draws the audience in, makes it a participant and creates a community. Perhaps also, it is this that made an informant tell me that għana 'bewitches you, it gives you goose flesh'.

These themes, stated so tersely here, will be the subject of the next section.

 
 

Introduction | The different genres of Għana | The Evolution of Għana | Għana as ritual
Għana, honour and 'folklore' | Conclusion | Notes | References

Top - Fuq        Back - Lura